| I
was very honored when Rhonda Samuel, the President of the
Long Island Board of Managers of Cancer Care of Long Island,
invited me to speak at this luncheon in honor of the women
I personally have always honored as the founding mothers of
the most powerful group of advocates in the entire United
States. When I think about the amazing accomplishments of
Long Island’s grassroots breast cancer warriors, the first
thing that comes to mind is what the women in this room and
their colleagues have done to change the landscape that existed
a mere decade or two ago.
Today,
in 2002:
1. The importance of funding for breast cancer research is
on the front burner of public consciousness.
2. The importance of the political process and of the active
involvement of politicians in the fight against breast cancer
is on the front burner.
3. The importance of environmental awareness and of protecting
the public against the carcinogens and the other deadly substances
that surround us is on the front burner.
4. The importance – and even the promise – of finding a cure
for breast cancer is on the front burner.
5. The importance of genes and their implication in the genesis
of some breast cancers is now on the front burner.
6. The importance of both individual and collaborative efforts
in the fight against breast cancer is on the front burner.
7. The importance of women believing in their power to change
things for the better is now on the front burner.

In
very real ways, they and the people they have inspired have
come out of a long dark tunnel – that once appeared to have
no end – into the light of hope. Not in the light of a cure
or even of sure-fire treatments. Not in the light of definitive
studies that offer answers or even of revolutionary theories.
And not in the light of plain, oldfashioned healthcare, which
in many ways is even more impersonal and cold than it was
even a decade ago.
And while too many women are still in that dark tunnel of
anxiety and fear, of not knowing and not trusting, of wondering
and worrying, they are no longer at the beginning of the tunnel
– a day when their daughters and granddaughters will be able
to talk about breast cancer in the past tense. As all of you
know, that light, no matter how dim or flickering it may seem
at times, didn’t happen overnight. The struggles of the Long
Island advocates had precedence in a history that, if anything,
confirms that what they’ve been fighting for is valid.
As
far back as the mid-1940’s – a decade in which many of the
people here today were born – Long Island was primarily a
farming community. But when thousands upon thousands of servicemen
came back from World War II, the lure of affordable housing
was irresistible. And it was not long before major aerospace
and other industries followed and with them millions upon
millions of tons of waste byproducts that permeated the soil
and inevitably found their way into the water system.
During
these years, children ran playfully after the fog trucks that
sprayed DDT to kill mosquitoes and laughed when they got lost
in the pesticide’s dust clouds. The “miracle chemical” was
sprayed on vegetables that were served each evening at the
dinner table, on cattle from which steaks, roasts, and hamburgers
were made, on cotton that became articles of clothing, and
on children themselves to so-called prevent the “blight” of
polio.Over the next couple of decades, the population of Nassau
and Suffolk counties nearly tripled. In the 1960’s, the national
incidence of breast cancer was 1 in 20. Long Island activists
were already lodging lawsuits against a huge federal- and
state-directed spray campaign of DDT to eradicate the Gypsy
moth. Nearly four hundred thousand gallons of the chemical
were sprayed on Long Island, four times the amount than was
sprayed in neighboring areas like Queens or Westchester County.
Four
years later, Rachel Carson, the trailblazing author of Silent
Spring and a breast cancer patient herself, described the
fatal effects that pesticides – including DDT – had on birds,
fiddler crabs and, she suspected, human beings.
In
1972, DDT was banned nationally, but the ban did nothing to
stop the chemical’s breakdown products, such as DDE, from
continuing to contaminate the environment and be increasingly
implicated in human ills. These were the years in which plastic
products were developed and proliferated in industry and household
use, spewing forth invisible and toxic PCBs that when carried
on the wind found their way to wildlife, snow, human skin
and even breast milk.
These
were the years in which radiation, “the miracle treatment”
was used routinely – in high and unregulated doses – on everything
from acne to the thymus glands of thousands of babies, many
of them female. And these were the years when doctors advertised
their favorite brand of cigarette on TV.

Indeed,
these were the years when there was simply no association
between human health and environmental toxins. We now know
that environmental hazards exists throughout the country.
But on Long Island, unlike other parts of the country, there
is no getting rid of them. Since Long Island is unique in
having a sole-source aquifer, once the contaminants reach
the water supply, they stay there – decade after decade after
decade.
The
first was brought about by the incredible efforts of a young
housewife with two young children who lived in upstate New
York. Lois Gibbs, suspecting that the near-epidemic of neurological
conditions, miscarriages, and cancers were not “coincidental,”
as state and medical authorities continued to claim, went
door to door collecting data and with a journalist to document
her work, insisted that the toxic plume from the Hooker Chemical
Company that ran underneath the town’s public school was poisoning
the residents of Love Canal.
Finally,
in 1979 – without admitting any culpability – the state agreed
to relocate all the residents of the community. But Lois Gibbs’
activism had inflamed the imagination of the public and encouraged
untold numbers of community activists throughout the country
to take matters into their own hands.
The
second thing that happened in 1979 came about because Dr.
Andre Varma, professor of community and preventive medicine
at Stony Brook, became alarmed by the rising breast cancer
incidence on Long Island and concerned that nothing was being
done to study the phenomenon. That same year, he wrote a grant
and applied for funding for a study. But he told me that it
took several more years – because of the difficulty of coordinating
with various agencies and dealing with the clashing egos of
the participants – before the study got off the ground.
In
1981, Leah Lauter, an associate professor at the Adelphi School
of Social Work, realized that women with breast cancer had
no place to go for support or information. Reaching out to
area hospitals for referrals, she instituted the first breast
cancer support group at the university. After five years,
as the groups expanded to include husbands and children, the
program had 59 volunteers and had served 3,000 women. The
volunteers also instituted a regional hotline. Interestingly,
the hotline was initially called the Woman-to-Woman hotline
because the word “breast” and certainly the words “breast
cancer” were still not spoken in public.Mrs. Lauter worked
closely with the late – and powerful – State Senator Michael
Tully to have insurance companies cover the cost of mammography
and to enact legislation that insured that women were told
all of their alternatives before choosing a particular treatment.
And in 1988, she wrote a proposal for a statewide hotline,
which became a reality in 1990, a year after she retired.
In
1984, a small article in Newsday reported on breast cancer
incidence in Long Island. It stated that “in Nassau County,
the rate was 112.6 cases per one hundred thousand women per
year, or 18.9 percent above the state average; and in Suffolk
County the rate was 103.6 cases per one hundred thousand women
per year, or 9.4 percent above the state average.” In short,
the incidence of breast cancer in both Nassau and Suffolk
Counties was significantly higher than it was throughout the
state, or in neighboring Queens or in nearby Westchester County,
which has a demographic profile strikingly similar to Long
Island.
That
same year, Jane Gitlin founded The Women’s Record. Although
the paper had a relatively small circulation, its mailing
list included all of Long Island’s shakers and movers: politicians,
educators, physicians, and business people. My assignment
was to find out what the breast cancer problem was all about.
But
from the outset, it was clear that the people from the county
and state health departments who I believed were in the position
to give me answers either couldn’t or didn’t want to. And
the doctors I spoke with seemed completely at a loss to explain
the great number of women they were seeing with breast cancer.

The
lack of answers I was getting enraged me – but luckily I’m
mobilized by rage! I realized that the solitary article I
was assigned would be insufficient to cover what needed to
be covered, not only the clinical aspects of breast cancer
but also the environmental, political, legislative, legal,
economic and emotional aspects as well. I ended up writing
an eight-part series and, over the next many years, hundreds
of other articles.
Luckily,
Jane allowed me to engage in advocacy journalism, challenging
the design of the New York State study and the sluggishness
with which the researchers released their findings, the apathy
of politicians, the neglect of environmental issues and the
patronizing medical policies that made women the very last
people to participate in their own health care!
But
there was also good news. Senator Tully, as chairman of the
state health department, continued fighting and legislating
for Long Island’s breast cancer patients and former Nassau
6 History of Breast Cancer Advocacy continued from County
Executive Thomas J. Gulotta mandated that every women in the
county be given a free mammogram, a program that still exists
and is the only one of its kind in the country.
|

State Senators Tom DiNapoli and the late Norman Levy were
also among the earliest on board, fighting alongside the advocates
for better legislation and funding for important projects.
In
1989, Barbara Balaban took over the directorship of the Adelphi
Breast Cancer Support Group and Hotline. Barbara, who is in
Seattle today attending a breast cancer forum, was a social
worker by education but a powerful and effective political
activist by conviction and experience. At Adelphi, she immediately
began making trips to Albany and addressing the inequities
between the treatment of white women and African American
and Latina women. As all of you know, her advocacy has never
flagged.
One
day, about a year or so after Barbara took the reins, a young
woman named Marie Quinn met with her to say that she was receiving
the same treatment for breast cancer that her mother had received
the 20 years before. “We have to do something!” Marie said.
“I want to make this political!.” Within weeks, a meeting
was set up to discuss the possibility. Out of that meeting
came plans for the first-ever breast cancer rally to be held
in front of the Nassau County Courthouse, and also the establishment
of the first-ever political action breast cancer group on
Long Island, 1 in 9, which was founded by Marie Quinn and
Fran Kritchek and formally instituted in November of 1990.
The
same year, a press conference was held at Stony Brook, announcing
the results of the twiceredesigned Long Island Breast Cancer
Study. Dr. Philip Nasca of the state health department told
the audience that environmental factors had been ruled out
and that no further studies would be undertaken.
His
findings didn’t sit well with Faith Larsen, a breast cancer
survivor and the owner of Merrick Life and three other South
Shore newspapers, nor with her daughter, Linda Toscano, Merrick
Life’s publisher, who had reported widely on breast cancer
and had published a lengthy questionnaire in the newspaper
that revealed “hot spots” of the disease in both residential
and work places.
What
Dr. Nasca and others involved in the study hadn’t counted
on was the outrage his report engendered. And when Mrs. Larsen
and Linda Toscano, among many others, as well as the full
force of the newly instituted 1 in 9, took action – under
the dedicated and determined leadership of Geri Barish – and
demanded a new study, the powers-that-be knew they were witnessing
an unprecedented phenomenon: Women NOT accepting what was
clearly unacceptable!
The following year, in 1992, Lorraine Pace, a West Islip resident,
got breast cancer, and when she was walking around her neighborhood
recovering from her radiation and chemotherapy treatments,
she met 20 other women in an eight-block radius who had breast
cancer.
About the same time, she attended a hearing on breast cancer
that was sponsored by Senator Alfonse D’Amato, who had begun
to demand – at the urging of the activists – federal intervention
to review the conclusions of the Long Island Breast Cancer
Study. I was at that meeting and I’ll never forget Harriett
Orenstein, the Director of Cancer Care of Long Island at that
time, stand up to address the panel of experts from the Centers
for Disease Control.

“Women
want to know,” she said, “Why me? Why now? Why on Long Island?
And Why in certain pockets of Long Island?” Lorraine suspected
that she was living in a hot spot of cancer and wanted answers
to the same questions. She appealed to her oncologist to design
a study to be distributed throughout her community, asked
the public-relations person at Good Samaritan Hospital to
help with the publicity, asked the county health commissioner
for help 7 History of Breast Cancer Advocacy and enlisted
the assistance of the editor and publisher of her community’s
newspaper to publish the study on the front page. In addition,
she contacted Dr. Roger Grimson, an epidemiologist at Stony
Brook, to analyze the data and finally, enlisted 17 amazing
and selfless women to collect the surveys and, over a period
of two years, earmark their results on a map on her kitchen
table. That group of women became the second activist group
on Long Island, The West Islip Breast Cancer Coalition.
Some
of the early activists had been members of the Adelphi support
group and volunteer hotline, others had moved to 1 in 9 to
get more politically involved. But these were women with communities
of their own, priorities of their own and with their own original
ideas.
Again,
it was not long before Barbara Masry and Linda Ronn established
a Great Neck coalition and before other coalitions were established
in Huntington, Babylon, Brentwood-Bay Shore, Long Beach, The
South Fork, the Town of Islip and, eventually, in over 20
communities on Long Island.
It
was still in the early to mid-90’s when this formidable force
of advocates was routinely traveling to Albany and to Washington
to lobby for increased research funding, better legislation
and, yes, a NEW study that would address the possible relationship
between breast cancer and the environment. The results – and
success – of their lengthy and arduous efforts are well known,
and I very much look forward to hearing from Dr. Marilee Gammon
today about what lies ahead in the areas of breast cancer
research.
During
these years, while each group provided support to women of
their communities and also engaged in political action, each
group also found its own focus. 1 in 9 concentrated on raising
funds for genetic research at the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
and in establishing Hewlett House, a resource center for women
with breast cancer and their families, and Michael’s Haven
for children with cancer and their families.
Huntington
began a huge mapping project of 68,000 residents, and initiated
and “I Am Fed Naturally” lawn flag campaign that encourages
homeowners to eliminate toxic chemicals on their property
and promotes alternative methods to ground maintenance. Huntington
also started B.A.T, a breast-awareness training program for
young women. And Karen Miller was only one of two women (the
other was Martha Rogers from the South Fork Breast Health
Coalition) that the NCI selected from Long Island to be a
Peer Reviewer Community Representative for its study.
Elsa
Ford from the Brentwood-Bay Shore coalition became the recognized
and respected science expert to whom everyone always turned
for a cogent explanation of what the disease and the environment
were all about.
Ginny
Regnante from the West Islip Coalition has been an advocate
from the very beginning , asking all the right questions and
insisting on nothing less than straight answers.
Dr.
Virginia Maurer gave up a successful general practice several
years ago to concentrate solely on breast care and the women
of Long Island who know and respect her are very happy that
she did.
Dianne Sackett Nannery, who was diagnosed with breast cancer
and then lymphedema in the mid-90’s was also an original thinker,
first imagining and them implementing a pink-wrist band policy
that is now accepted nationwide as a way to alert breast cancer
patients to post-op procedures that may lead to lymphedema,
as well as initiating the first-ever Breast Cancer Awareness
postage stamp and collaborating with me on a book about lymphedema.
Debbie
Basile, Patricia Spicer, Jodi Hollingshead, Joyce Smolkin,
Wilma Carroll, Victoria White – all are the heroines of Long
Island’s breast cancer advocacy movement and all of our region’s
women owe them a debt of thanks for their tireless work.
In
the late 90’s Hillary Rutter became the Director of the Adelphi
support program and statewide hotline and everyone knows of
her wonderful work, along with Cancer Care, in establishing
Sisters United in Health, an outreach program to Latina and
Afro-American women, and for her outreach to teens and young
women on both state and national levels.
And
I can’t omit many of the women who where “there” from the
beginning. Ellen Troisi from Nassau County; Dee McCabe from
the American Cancer Society; Melba Tolliver, the national
and local news broadcaster and journalist; Eve Boden, a registered
nurse who was on the educational board of Adelphi’s first
Hotline; Minna Barrett and Louise Levine from 1 in 9, Sandi
Kafenbaum of Adelphi, Chris Conniff Sheahan, the editor and
publisher of Networking magazine, the list goes on and on
and on.
But
that is a drop in the proverbial bucket of the many, many
thousands of women on Long Island – including the women in
this room today – who have managed – heroically – to cope
with the frightening diagnosis of breast cancer, to make impossible
decisions about treatment, to have to raise their kids and
maintain their marriages and jobs through the hell of radiation
and chemotherapy treatments and their often devastating side
effects, to somehow handle the anxiety that comes not only
from every sniffle or backache but also from a dreaded recurrence.
They
– and you – have managed to summon up the immense resilience
and inner strength – of character and heart – to lobby, to
lick envelopes, to travel, to volunteer and to attend meetings
in order to help win the battle against breast cancer for
other women. They - and you - have managed to find the wherewithall
to focus legitimate frustration and anger on political issues
in the most powerful ways and to address all the failures
of “the system,” including the problems with the NY State
Cancer Registry, the “drive-through” mastectomy policy, the
hurdles of the medical system and the pathetic sluggishness
of the research about the genetic or environmental roots of
the disease.
I
stand humbled in your presence and thank you for the privilege
of addressing you. |