
BREAST
CANCER RATE NOT LINKED TO EMF
by Laura Mgrdichian,
Suffolk Life
 |
| At a
press conference in June 2003, attended by Breast Cancer Activists
and the News Media, Dr. Cristina Leske announces her research
team’s findings of The Electromagnetic Field Study conducted
at Stony Brook Universty’s School of Medicine. |
In
a groundbreaking study, researchers at Stony Brook University’s
School of Medicine found that there is no indication that electromagnetic
fields produced from power lines and appliances, increase the
risk of breast cancer. If nothing else, this news may bring Long
Island women a little extra reassurance that one possible cause,
at least, has been ruled out.
The study’s major finding showed that there were no differences
in the electromagnetic field levels in and near the homes of women
who have breast cancer and those who don’t. This points to the
conclusion that there is no association between EMF and breast
cancer.
The study is the most comprehensive of its kind. It took $2.5
million and six years to complete and involved Long Island women
exclusively. The study’s principal investigator is Dr. Cristina
Leske, a professor of preventive medicine at the School of Medicine.
“This is good news”, said Leske. “What we thought was something
that could have been a risk factor, we did not find.”
The
basis for the study was a possible connection between EMF and
breast cancer that involved the hormones melatonin and estrogen.
Because EMF can affect the production of melatonin and melatonin
can affect the production of estrogen, which is linked to breast
cancer, it was hypothesized that EMF might cause an increased
risk of breast cancer.
“We really did not think of EMF fields as being harmful to our
health,” said Leske. “We felt that this was a hypothesis that
was very much worth exploring.”
The
women in the study were required to have lived in their homes
for at least 15 years and were divided into two groups, the cases
and the controls. There were 576 women in the cases group, all
with breast cancer, and 585 in the controls group, all without
breast cancer. The ages of the women in both groups ranged from
20 to 74 with an average age of 58.
These particular women were chosen because they had participated
in a previous study known as the Long Island Breast Cancer Study
Project; the participation rate was thus very high. The resulting
interviews, which asked participants about their residential history
and general EMF exposure, became part of the new study. The new
study conducted a second round of interviews that were much more
specific; the interviews were blind such that the interviewers
did not know which women had breast cancer.
Following
this several EMF measurements were taken in each woman’s home.
Spot measurements were taken at the front door, bedroom, and most
frequently used room. Ground current measurements and measurements
spanning 24 hours were also taken in those two rooms. The study
also took into account any major power lines that are nearby.
When analyzed, the measurements provided to be no different between
the women with breast cancer and the women without it. Some homes
did have higher levels than others, but the range of EMF was the
same in both groups.
With that possible cause out of the way, what else could be causing
Long Island’s high rate? Leske said a study had been conducted
on cell phone and microwave radiations but would not comment because
it had not been released yet. As for investigating other possible
causes, she said her group “Hasn’t decided which way we will go
next,” but that breast cancer research would continue vigorously.
She added that there is still data being analyzed.
Debbie Winn, the Director for the National Cancer Institute is
funding research that will follow young girls for four to five
years. Studying them could determine what they might be exposed
to while growing up that would increase their risk for breast
cancer.
“We would look at how cells develop, how things like toxic chemicals
may affect hormonal levels and cells in the breast, Winn said.
“There are still a lot of issues out there.”
Reprinted with permission from Suffolk Life